“The Epic of Gilgamesh” and The Male Experience
There
are various aspects of The Epic of Gilgamesh that one could focus on. However, one of the best analyses of the
story is how it relates to the male experience in ancient times, especially concerning
male intimacy. Additionally, the relationship
between Gilgamesh and Enkidu in The Epic of Gilgamesh serves as prime example
of male bonding and is typical of the intimacy men shared in the ancient
world. Also, there are numerous examples
from ancient history and literature that have much in common with The Epic of
Gilgamesh concerning the importance of male intimacy in the ancient world. Furthermore, male bonds like the one
illustrated in The Epic of Gilgamesh served to strengthen the male ego and
prepare ancient men for their roles in society.
Finally, the most prevalent topic examined in The Epic of Gilgamesh is
mankind’s timeless struggle with death.
The
Epic of Gilgamesh is not just a simple story of heroism it is also a tale of intimate
camaraderie. Gilgamesh was the legendary
hero and ruler of Urak, what is now modern day Iraq, and Enkidu was his
constant companion. Gilgamesh was an unlikable character in the beginning of
the story. He was an arrogant, selfish man
that and pursued very base and hedonistic pleasures. Also, he abused his authority and was
despised by the people he ruled over. Despite
his shortcomings in character, he found no one who could match him in physical
stature and greatness until he met Enkidu.
Although Gilgamesh prevailed over Enkidu in their wrestling match, each
found in the other their equal and complimentary opposite. This was the
catalyst that developed an intimate life long friendship. Due to his love for his close friend, Gilgamesh
evolved into a better man and ruler of his people. Thanks to the friendship and support of
Enkidu, Gilgamesh became loved by his people and established his legacy.
In The
Epic of Gilgamesh there are multiple examples of the intimacy Gilgamesh and
Enkidu shared. At various times
throughout the story it was eluded to how they completed each other. Reminiscent
of the modern day description of a husband and wife, their friendship was as
strong if not stronger than any brotherly bond known. Additionally,
in the Epic of Gilgamesh the affection they shared for one another was described
as greater than that of a man for a woman.
Furthermore, the relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, when viewed
from a modern cultural perspective, could be mistaken for one of lovers. However, it should be noted that the friendship
among men in ancient times were more intimate than today. Regardless, the bond between Gilgamesh and
Enkidu was one of mutual welfare and benefit that pushed each to become better
than what they could be without the other.
Furthermore,
Gilgamesh and Enkidu had no reservation about expressing affection for one
another. There is one part of the story
that mentioned Gilgamesh and Enkidu holding hands while they fell asleep. This behavior would not be typical of a
modern heterosexual male, especially in western cultures. However, once again Gilgamesh and Enkidu
should not be mistaken for lovers. Men
in ancient times were more intimate with each other and were not ashamed of
it. They were not burden by the same social
stigmas and cultural inhibitions that plague modern man. Unfortunately, due to the conveniences of
modern living man feels he has lost the need for such intimacy. In fact most modern men are very distant from
each other even in the same family. What
a shame that modern man does not enjoy the level of intimacy that men shared in
ancient times. Finally, the world would
probably be a much better place if men experienced just half the amount of
intimacy that ancient men knew.
The friendship of Gilgamesh and Enkidu in the Epic
of Gilgamesh is typical of the close intimate bonds men shared in the ancient
past. Strong male connections were very important
in the ancient world. The rigors of
surviving in the ancient world were a daily struggle everyone was required to
overcome by whatever means fair or unfair.
Ancient man fought for every thing that was his. He competed for his food, his home, and even the
right to procreate. Also, providing protection
for his family both immediate and extended was a constant concern. Therefore, often alliances between
individuals or groups of individuals would immerge. Furthermore, it could be argued that the necessities
of survival led people to group together into tribes, city-states and
eventually nations. So, naturally when
everything one had including their very life depended upon these collaborations,
intense loving bonds would evolve between men.
The
strength of male unions can even change the course of history. The Battle of Teutoberger Wald is one
instance were brotherly love made such an impact. 1The Cherusci, a Germanic tribe, led by their
chief Arimus delivered a shocking defeat to the Roman Empire at Teutoberger
Wald. They annihilated three Roman
legions and supporting troops. The
outcome of this battle was the Romans were never able to control the Germanic
Frontier and the course of European history being changed. Many historians would credit the victory to
terrain, tactics, and guile. However, it
can be argued that this impossible victory was due to the bonds the warriors
shared, the most important being the bond between the chieftain and his
people. “The chieftain was bond to his
people as they were to him, by ties of family, kinship and language. He was expected to be generous with gifts as
well as to receive his due from others.
In battle he was expected to lead as well as to command. His place was at the forefront of the action,
surrounded by the warriors of his household.”
(Devries, Dougherty,
Dickie, Jestice, Rice 173) This culture
attitude was passed down and imbedded in latter works of literature in Europe. The vibrant Old Norse poems in The Poetic
Edda provide some of the best illustrations.
To quote some examples from Henry Adams Bellows translation of The
Poetic Edda: “To his friend a man a friend shall prove,
to him and the friend of his friend; But never a man shall friendship make with
one of his foeman’s friends.” (The Poetic Edda, Hovamol 43) “If a friend thou hast whom thou fully wilt
trust, and good from him wouldst get, thy thoughts with his mingle, and gifts
shalt thou make, and fare to find him oft.” (The Poetic Edda, Hovamol 44) Clearly ancient Germanic males had close
intimate ties.
The
ancient Greeks are another shinning example of male intimacy in the ancient
world. The ancient Greek city-state
relied on the strength of its male bonds for survival. This was mainly because of the manner in
which battles were fought and won. “The
supreme arbiter of ancient Greek disputes was the Phalanx, a great mass of
spear-armed citizen-soldiers (hoplites) called out to fight for the honor, the
interest or sometimes survival of their home city.” (Devries,
Dougherty, Dickie, Jestice, Rice 72) “Being
a member of the phalanx was an elite privilege.” (Devries,
Dougherty, Dickie, Jestice, Rice 73) “To be a hoplite was the pinnacle of
Ancient Greek manliness.” (Devries,
Dougherty, Dickie, Jestice, Rice 73) Furthermore, the Phalanx was a tight
military formation in which one hoplite depended on the shield of the person
next to him for defense while he attacked the enemy. Each Greek hoplite’s life depended on the
discipline and bravery of his fellow hoplite.
A unique intense obligation developed when each man was both responsible
and dependant upon the other for their very life and the survival of their
community.
It
is probably no coincidence that the Spartans were the finest examples of both Greek
manliness and male intimacy. Spartans
were extremely hard and lethal men. They
were a deadly force to be reckoned with collectively as well as
individually. “The moral training was
aimed at producing unflinching courage, total obedience, and, as the Spartan
king Agesilas once said, "contempt of pleasure" {Kitto 93}.”
(Muhlberger) Furthermore, Spartan women were equally
tough in their own rite and uncompromisingly demanded their men develop and maintain
an elite warrior ethos. To create this iconic warrior, all Spartan men were
trained from birth to be soldiers. Mothers
sent their boys away at age 7 to start military training. After completing their military training
young men were allowed to marry.
However, they continued to eat and sleep in a barracks-group until the
age of 30. Spartan men were finally
permitted to live in their own houses after the age of 30 but still ate in
barracks until they were too old to fight.
Spartan social engineering created men that
shared more intimacy with their comrade in arms than with their own wife and
families. While this may seem odd from a
modern perspective, it was a necessary by-product of the culture strategy used to
protect the interest of the Spartan people.
There
are further examples in ancient Greek literature of close intimate
relationships between men. One example
is the “archetypical bond between Achilles and Patroclus in The Iliad.” ("Achilles
and Patroclus." Wikipedia. 2009)
In The Iliad Achilles and Patroclus are extremely close compatriots and
joyfully face danger and death together. “Achilles is tender to Patroclus,
callous and arrogant towards others.
Although most warriors fought for personal fame or their city-state (including
Achilles), at certain junctures in the Iliad, Achilles emphasizes his
relationship with Patroclus above all else.
He dreams that all Greeks would die so that he and Patroclus might gain
the fame of conquering Troy alone. After
Patroclus dies, Achilles agonizes touching his dead body, smearing himself with
ash, and fasting. Achilles returns to
the battlefield with the sole aim of revenging himself upon Hector, Patroclus's
killer, even though the gods had warned him that it would cost him his life.”
(“Achilles and Petroclus." Wikipedia. 2009) In summary, the love Achilles displayed for
Patroclus in The Iliad is an outstanding example of male intimacy in ancient
Greek literature.
Moreover,
the agony Achilles felt over the death of Patroclus parallels the pain and
anguish Gilgamesh experienced losing Enkidu to his fated demise. Furthermore, both feel a call to action,
Achilles avenging Patroclus’s in battle and Gilgamesh’s search for immortality
after losing Enkidu to the pains and suffering of a mortal death. In conclusion, The Iliad corresponds to The
Epic of Gilgamesh in regards to male intimacy and is representative of the
affinity Greek men held for their male companions.
The
fact that The Epic of Gilgamesh provides a glimpse of male intimacy in the
ancient world is an important issue. However, the rite of passage into manhood and
the male ego are also relevant topics of discussion. Every culture since the dawn of time has had expectations
of manliness that affect the male psyche.
Sometimes these expectations are that of a warrior and protector. Other times men are expected to be rogue
adventures and seekers of glory. Still other times the role of a nurturing
provider is expected of men. Despite
these expectations, men usually seek out adventure first. Men winning victory and gaining glory before settling
down to the comfort, safety and tranquility of a domestic life is a typical
pattern in life and ancient literature. Furthermore,
this pattern could be considered a rite of passage of sorts. Its sole purpose is to strengthen the frail male
ego. This pattern is obviously present
in The Epic of Gilgamesh. First of all, Gilgamesh
refusing the love of Ishtar clearly illustrates man’s desire to first
experience conquest and adventure before domestication. Lastly, Gilgamesh and Enkidu fulfilled an egotistical
need to prove their greatness by killing the fearsome demon-giant Humbaba and also
slaying the Bull of Heaven.
The
right of passage into manhood can also lead into mutually beneficial and
rewarding friendships. There is a rowdy
adventurous time in a male’s youth when they think that they are capable of
conquering the world. Most men when they
are young fancy themselves as invincible; some take this more literally than
others. When such types, let’s call them
alpha males; find their equals or betters they naturally want to ally
themselves with them. You see this in the Epic of Gilgamesh when Gilgamesh
defeated Enkidu in a test of wrestling skill and strength. Despite the outcome of the match both see
greatness in the other and perhaps something they are missing in themselves,
striking a life long intimate friendship.
They do so with an intuition of fulfilling some great cause and
achieving greatness. In friendships such
a Gilgamesh and Enkidu, each pushes the other to greater heights of achievement
and glory.
Even
today one can see examples of the relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu in
modern cinema, especially martial art movies.
In these stories, men who are bested want to join forces with the one
that beat them. Sometimes they do so to
become their student and better themselves.
Other times they do so to fulfill some destiny or greater cause. In any
case the underlining theme in these friendships is for one or each to push the
other to greater heights of achievement then they could have achieved alone. Finally, I feel the following quote from the
Bible summarizes ancient man’s attitude toward friendships: “As iron sharpens iron,
so one man sharpens another.” (New International Version Bible, Proverbs 27:17)
Man in
every age has contemplated and has had to come to terms with death and dying. Various theologies have emerged from man’s
eternal struggle with his own mortality.
Many learned to place their hopes in a better afterlife. Some came to the conclusion that birth, life,
and death are a natural never ending cycle that everything and everyone is a
part of. Still others took the same
basic cyclic view and describe it with such concepts as reincarnation and
spiritual evolution. Over the ages many
theories evolved to help mankind cope with the fear of death. Regardless of the theory all have come to
accept the reality that a no one can escape mortal death. Furthermore, despite the fear of the unknown
and the pain of losing loved ones most have accepted birth, life and death as
the natural order of things.
However,
there are many examples throughout history of those who have sought out the
secrets of immortality only to come up empty-handed. Who has not wish for immortality at some
point in their life? The ancient Chinese
attempted to create elixirs of immortality but often times instead of providing
eternal life they slowly poisoned and killed the ones taking it. Although not all of the elixirs proved fatal,
none of them ever provided immortality.
In the western world, explorers were still looking for the fabled
Fountain of Youth when they discovered the Americas. These experiments, searches, and journeys for
immortality have always been in vain.
In the end man always faces the grim reality of his own mortality.
There
are many fine works of literature that cover the issues of life and death. However, The Epic of Gilgamesh is one of the
finest examples of humanities timeless struggle with its own mortality. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, after losing his
companion Gilgamesh searched for the secret of immortality. Seeing his friend so strong and virile in the
prime of his life only to suffer an agonizing death had a profound affect on
Gilgamesh. He was initially grief
stricken by the loss of his beloved friend Enkidu. He then began to fear his own mortality. Finally, Gilgamesh became angered at the
cruel indignity of death. To deal with
the pain of losing his friend and his own fear of death he resolved himself to
find the cure for death and the secret to immortality. To add nobility to his cause, Gilgamesh
intended to bring back the secret of immortality for the benefit of all. After a long and arduous journey, he found
the secret to immortality only to lose it to a serpent. In the end, despite his greatness, Gilgamesh
still had to face death as all men are required to do.
The
Epic of Gilgamesh is a metaphor of life for us all. It is a story of youth and the eventual
mortality everyone must come to terms with.
In the beginning many of us like Gilgamesh start our life story as
unlikable characters. We begin our
journeys with a very selfish view and self centered approach to life. Often times we pursue very base hedonistic
pleasures. Furthermore, we start off
life very brash, thinking we can conquer the world, and that we are
invincible. However, facing ones own
mortality forces people to evolve. We
begin to care for other people and things besides ourselves. Additionally, we start to search for deeper
truths. While it is true that life
provides the opportunity for individuals to become better human beings, it is
death that motivates people to achieve greatness.
The
Epic of Gilgamesh is a fascinating story that one could draw much inspiration
from and talk about a variety of issues.
However, when the focus is concentrated on the male experience it is
plain to see that The Epic of Gilgamesh reveals the importance male intimacy
had in ancient cultures. Furthermore,
there are many parallel examples in history and literature demonstrating the
important role male bonding played in the ancient world. Men were expected to fulfill many roles in
the past and much is still expected of them today. Additional, the male ego can be a fragile
thing. Today just as in the past a rite
of passage serves to strengthen the male psyche and prepare him for his roles
in society, sometimes providing rewarding friendship along the way. Finally, I feel the most underling theme in
the Epic of Gilgamesh is humanities timeless struggle with its own mortality.
Works Cited
"The
Epic of Gilgamesh." The Bedford Anthology of World Literature The
Ancient World, Beginnings-100 C.E. Eds. Paul Davis, Gay Harrison, David M.
Johnson, Patricia C. Smith, John F. Crawford, and THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO.
Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins, 2004. 55-91.
Devries, Kelly, et al. Battles of
the Ancient World 1285 BC~AD 451 . New York, NY: Metro Books, 2007.
Bellows,
Henry A. The Poetic Edda The Mythological Poems. Mineola, NY: Dover
Publications, Inc, 2004.
Muhlberger,
Steve. "History 2055-Ancient Civilizations Athens and Sparta." Nipissing
University Hist 2055, Lecture 19 (Sep. 1 1998): 10 July 2009
<http://www.nipissingu.ca/department/history/muhlberger/2055/l19anc.htm>.
"The Iliad." The Bedford Anthology of World
Literature The Acient World, Beginnings-100 C.E. Eds. Paul Davis, Gary
Harrison, David M. Johnson, Patricia C. Smith, John F. Crawford, and THE
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO. Boston , MA: Bedford/St. Martin's, 288-420.
"Achilles
and Petroclus." Wikipedia. 2009. 10 July 2009 . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achilles_and_Patroclus
Davis, Paul, ed. The
New International Version Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishers,
1973.
Comments
Post a Comment