Beowulf-Themes, Motifs and Symbols
There is a treasure trove of
symbolism in the epic poem called Beowulf. In fact, there is so much symbolism in Beowulf that to study or consider it
only on its merit as a good story would not do it justice. Furthermore, one would miss out on all the
beautiful allegory contained within this extraordinary literary work. Beowulf is more than just simply a story; it
is a profound teaching narrative. Its
true value lies with the many potential lessons it has to impart. These lessons lie within the symbolism in
this work. This symbolism can be found
in various aspects of this poem to include; the poetic devices used, use of
words, the Pagan and Christian elements within, the characters and their
interactions, places in this story, and weapons used. Also, Beowulf relation to the stages in a
warrior’s life is relevant to discuss.
Finally, this paper will provide a background on this epic poem as well
as explore the many potential symbols within and concerning this famous piece
of literature.
Beowulf is a heroic tale
concerning the exploits a Scandinavian prince and the story’s namesake
Beowulf. More than three thousand lines
long, Beowulf, is the oldest
surviving poem in Old English literature and it stands as one of the foundation
works of poetry in this language. Furthermore,
it is worthy to note that it is one of the earliest European epics not written
in Latin. This masterpiece was composed
by an unknown author around the Seventh Century in England. However, there are several theories that propose
the idea that Beowulf may actually have
had multiple authors and, in fact, originated from a much older oral
tradition. Interesting enough, there are some historical
elements to the epic poem Beowulf, as
well. The story took place in the Sixth
Century in what is now known as Denmark and Southern Sweden. (Beowulf, a New
Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney ix) Although,
it is unlikely that the main character, Beowulf, was a real person, he does the
fit the Germanic hero archetype found in many Northern European sagas and
myths. However, many of the other characters
and events in Beowulf are related to
real events and people. The following
characters; Hygelac, Hrothgar, Ongentheow, Haethcyn, Onela and Heardred were
all historical rulers in Scandinavia.
Also, the Ravenswood battle in the story actually took place in 510AD. ("History
of Beowulf")
Beowulf was composed
in Old English, the language spoken in Anglo-Saxon England from the early 400s
to around 1100. The author of Beowulf used many literary techniques
unique to the time period that add to the splendor and magnificence of this
poem. (Beowulf)(Beowulf, a New
Translation by Seamus Heaney) One of the
literary techniques used in this piece of poetry was that of alliteration. Used in song and poems, alliteration makes
use of a series of words in a row, or close to the same row, that has the first
consonant sound. Furthermore, Beowulf extensively used another poetic
device no longer commonly used in modern literature called kenning. (Wheeler) It is also worthwhile to mention
that the Northern Warrior tradition of Boasting and Flyting also played a
dominate role in this epic poem. Finally,
In Beowulf, there are stories within
the story. At various points in this
epic poem where it digressed from the main story line with interlacing
stories. Although a modern audience might
view this as interrupting the main story, this was a common narrative tradition
from the times when Beowulf was orated to when it was composed in written
form. The audience of the time would
have been familiar with these interlinking stories that form a web of profound
meaning. Furthermore, this digression
further served the purpose to illustrate what the role of a great warrior and
king was and to relate those qualities with Beowulf. There are so literary devices used in Beowulf that to mention them all would
be external to the intent of this paper.
However, bearing all this in mind, Beowulf,
makes a great case concerning the contribution of Germanic Culture to classical
literature, despite so many known classics coming from Greece and Rome. Beowulf
demonstrates that not everything with sophistication came from outside of
Northern Europe. Lastly, Beowulf also demonstrates that the
Mediterranean was not the only bastion of wisdom. Various cultures and civilizations have added
to the tapestry that is Humanity.
Beowulf which
is much admired for the richness of its poetry used kennings considerably
throughout the poem. These Kennings give
the poem it’s beautiful and imaginatively descriptive words. A Kenning is a metaphorical descriptions
commonly used in Old English, Old Norse, and Germanic poetry. They combine two words to create an evocative
and imaginative alternative word.
Kennings used mixed imagery to create new compound words or phrases to
describe an object or activity.
Furthermore, they often involved conjoining two types of dissimilar
imagery, extended metaphors, or mixed metaphors. Kennings allowed poets to experiment with
rhyme, sounds and imagery. A third of
the words in Beowulf contain Kennings and they add to the beauty and
imaginative quality of this epic poem. The
following are some examples of kennings in Beowulf; bone-house (human body),
battle-sweat (blood), ring-giver (ruler, king, feudal lord), word-hoard
(vocabulary), and whale-road (sea). Note
that in Beowulf that there are over a thousand kennings and there were multiple
ones used just to describe the sea. Although,
not as commonly used in literature these days, one can still find numerous
examples of kennings in Modern English. Here
are just some examples; penny-pincher (a miser or someone frugal with their
money), rug-rats (little children), and painted-jezebel (a woman wearing too
much cosmetics). The kennings really
add to the complexity and beauty of Beowulf. Furthermore, one could say taken as a whole Beowulf has kennings within
kennings. This only adds to the various
levels of meaning to interpret within Beowulf. ("The Skaldic Poetry Project")("The
British Library")
As previously mentioned, boasting played a significant
role in Beowulf. Boasting was a common warrior tradition in
Northern Europe during the time frame of Beowulf. Boasting was used by the warrior culture of
the time in the story to strive and to achieve higher levels of achievement and
to find the best in oneself. When one boasted,
they were choosing the heroic way of life.
When one boasted it became a vow and the hero placed himself in a
position from which he could not withdraw.
It is quite possible that the boast is the original source for the
tradition of the New Year’s resolution. One can see an example of this in the
following boast made by Beowulf in Heorot;
“I had
a fixed purpose when I put to sea.
As I
sat in the boat with my band of men,
I
meant to perform to the uttermost
what
your people wanted or perish in the attempt,
in the
fiend’s clutches.
And I
shall fulfill that purpose,
prove
myself with a proud deed
or
meet my death here in the mead-hall.” (Beowulf,
a New Translation by Seamus Heaney 632-638)
By making this boast Beowulf
placed himself in a position where he had to face Grendel. What’s more, he would need to kill this
monster or die trying.
Another aforementioned and customary Northern warrior
tradition in the time of Beowulf was flyting.
Flyting involved a game of verbal taunting or trash talking between two
warriors. One can see an example of
this in the extensive verbal banter between Unferth and Beowulf. Beowulf defeated Unferth in this verbal
battle of wits as can be seen in the following passage;
“Now I cannot recall
any fight you entered, Unferth,
that bears comparison.
I don’t boast when I say
that neither you nor Breca were ever much
celebrated for swordsmanship
or for facing danger on the field of battle.
you killed your own kith and kin,
so for all your cleverness and quick tongue,
you
will suffer damnation in the depths of hell.” (Beowulf, a New Verse Translation
by Seamus Heaney 582-589)
The last part of this passage
was especially damaging to Unferth because Beowulf reminded him of his
dishonorable behavior. In Beowulf’s
society, killing family members was a particularly despicable and disgraceful
act because the Pagan custom wergild or blood money could not be paid when one
murdered their own kin.
In Beowulf, there is a fascinating mixture of Pagan and
Christian elements. Beowulf is full of both Christian and
Pagan features, many of which are combined or in combination. Beowulf
is a reflection of England during a period of time when many things on the
surface appeared Christian but had Pagan undertones or influences. In Beowulf,
the world of the warrior is based on loyalty and bravery. Pagan customs of revenge are combined with
Christian faith and the notion of the will of God. Wyrd, originally a pagan concept, is
personified or identified as God’s will.
Grendel being a descendent of Cain comes from the Christian concept of
demon. The race of giants destroyed by
the flood is both Christian and Pagan, due to the fact that giants are found in
both Pagan and Christian myths. The
following are some quotes showing Christian elements; “Holy God” is a monotheistic references
indicative of Christianity. “Wisest Maker,
The Lord of Heaven” is a reference to monotheism indicative of
Christianity. “Wielding all seasons and
times: the true God he!” refers to a single God, superior God who is above
all. The following are some quotes
showing Pagan Elements; “to earn him lasting fame” refers to pagan ideas of
fame when the warrior fights a foe, which is very powerful, alone because this
way his fame will be heightened. “The
bairn to avenged” means the same thing as vendetta which is a pagan concept and
is against Christian teaching. “Safe saw
in combat downfall of demons” here we saw pagan concepts of life are to avenge,
which is contrary to Christianity. The
mixture of Pagan and Christian elements is intriguing. Furthermore, this piece of literature makes
for fascinating social implications. One can gain an appreciation for the time
period in which Beowulf was wrote, when
England was Christian but held onto many beliefs and customs of their Pagan
past. Interesting enough, one can still
find many of these Pagan elements in modern society. Many of the traditions most people prescribe
to the Judeo-Christian tradition may, in fact, actually be folk customs
predating the conversion of Europe to Christianity. (Kolomeyskaya)
Additionally, in Beowulf,
words themselves allude to a synthesis of Christian and Pagan elements. Upon further examination there are many words
of significant meaning in Beowulf. When defined, these words make it difficult
to discern if this epic has an entirely Christian or Pagan theme. For example, doom means eternal judgment,
decree, authority, discretion, choice, glory, and honor. This could fall within a Christian paradigm. Whereas, wyrd is liken to fate and destiny
but more closely associated with the non-Christian concept of karma. One could say that wyrd is the
personification of destiny as indicated in the following quote from Beowulf;
“Wyrd often preserves one not doomed to die, if his courage is strong!”
(Beowulf 572-573) It appears the
connotation of these words expanded to include to Christian concepts, with doom
relating to the judgment of God and wyrd the will of God. However, both the
words doom and wyrd more than likely had a slightly different contextual
meaning in the original Pagan perspective.
In fact, Beowulf, itself, may have originally been more Pagan in nature
and was toned down for a Christian audience resulting in a new Christo-Heathen
leitmotif with many layers of potential meaning.
Comparing
and contrasting the difference between Grendel’s encounter with Hrothgar to
that of Beowulf’s provides much to be gleaned.
A central and essential element in their encounters was Hrothgar’s mead
hall, Heorot. This makes the symbolism
behind Heorot a key concept to study.
Also, the manner in which each one approached this symbol is an
important matter to consider. Lastly, the actual undertakings of Beowulf and
Grendel at Heorot, their reasons, and the effects they had on Hrothgar are all
important when analyzing these characters encounters with one another. These fundamental areas in the encounters led
to the assessment that Grendel insolently brought chaos to Hrothgar, whereas
Beowulf respectfully liberated Heorot, reestablished order and Hrothgar’s
honor.
Much
of the events in Beowulf involving Hrothgar, the ruler of the Spear-Danes, take
place in Heorot. For simplicity, many
translators of the epic poem Beowulf
refer to Heorot as just a mead hall.
However, the mead hall itself was usually enclosed inside a larger
fortified area that served other important purposes such as the seat of
government, royal living quarters, housing of soldiers, housing of guest, and
many other functions that can only be speculated. In Seamus Heaney’ translation of Beowulf, he chooses the term “bawn” to
refer to Hrothgar’s hall. Heaney gives
the following definition and justification for its use in the introduction of
his translated version of Beowulf;
“In Elizabethan English, bawn (from the Irish bo`-duhu`n, a fort for cattle)
referred specifically to the fortified dwelling which the English planters
built in Ireland to keep the dispossessed natives at bay.” (Beowulf, a New
Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney xxx) Therefore a bawn used in this context
could be considered similar to a castle or, fort possible being the best
comparison. With this in mind, it is
important to further explore what a bawn symbolized. The bawn represented prosperity and the
actual mead hall itself symbolized a ruler’s generosity. A bawn was a bastion of order in a chaotic
world and it demonstrated a ruler’s, success, dominion, and control. Furthermore, the bawn not only represented a
ruler’s sovereignty over his people but his love and protection similar to that
of a husband. Therefore, the bawn would
be analogous to a wedding ring with the actual mead hall being the diamond
within the ring. By knowing what a bawn
and mead hall represented to the people of this epic one can begin to analyze
the differences between Beowulf and Grendel’s encounters with Hrothgar.
When
giving an account of Beowulf and Grendel’s encounters with Hrothgar it is
significant to note the manner in which they approached his bawn. The basic difference being that one showed
the greatest amount of respect and honor while the other demonstrated the
greatest of amount of contempt, defiance, and disrespect. Observe that when Beowulf arrived in
Hrothgar’s domain he paid close attention to protocol and showed Hrothgar the
utmost respect. Beowulf skillfully requested
the coast guard to send word ahead of his arrival and respectfully sought
permission to enter Heorot in order to gain an audience with Hrothgar. The following passage displays his
skillfulness and respect; “If your lord and master, the most renowned son of
Halfdane, will hear me out and graciously allow me to greet him in person, I am
ready and willing to report my errand.”
(Beowulf, a New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney 344) In contrast, Grendel approached Heorot
menacingly uninvited and as a frequent conqueror as indicated in the following
passage from Beowulf; “So Grendel
waged his lonely war, inflicting constant cruelties on the people, atrocious
hurt. He took over Heorot, haunted the
glittering hall after dark.” (Beowulf, a New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney
164) Lastly, the manner in which Grendel
invaded Hrothgar’s mead hall to commit these atrocities added further
indignity. One can see an obvious
example from the following section in Beowulf;
“Then his rage boiled over, he ripped open the mouth of the building, maddening
for blood, pacing the length of the patterned floor with his loathsome tread,
while a baleful light, flame more than light, flared form his eyes.” (Beowulf,
a New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney 723)
Some
final points to study concerning Beowulf and Grendel’s encounters with Hrothgar
are their actions at Heorot, their reasons, and the impact of these
exploits. Both Grendel and Beowulf’s
primary purpose for visiting Heorot was to kill. However, what drove their intentions was
quite different. Grendel visited Heorot
to commit senseless and chaotic murder.
Furthermore, there is no apparent motive as to why he senselessly
murdered mass numbers of Hrothgar’s vassals.
However unreasoned, this slaughter served to damage Hrothgar’s
credibility concerning his primary function as a leader and that is the
protection of his people. Divergently,
Beowulf’s main aim when visiting Heorot was to kill only Grendel. Additionally, his motivation was not only to
help Hrothgar and his people but to also win fame and glory for himself. Beowulf’s heroic pursuit of glory and him consequently
slaying Grendel served to reestablish Hrothgar’s eminence and standing among
his people. Finally, while Grendel’s
visit to Heorot created chaos and fear for Hrothgar’s subjects, Beowulf’s visit
brought peace and restored order for Hrothgar.
As
previously detailed in the elucidation of the encounters between Beowulf,
Hrothgar, and Grendel, the mead-hall, Heorot, symbolized a copious amount of
concepts. Heorot, in particular,
represented a people at the apex of their power and preeminence. This was symbolized the high hall built by
King Hrothgar, one “meant to be a wonder of the world forever” (Beowulf
70) However, the supremacy displayed by
the Spear Danes was ersatz and required Beowulf’s heroic intervention to
restore peace, order and harmony. All
of which, King Hrothgar’s mead-hall, Heorot, was supposed to epitomize.
Weapons were another form of symbolism in Beowulf and the
following were some noteworthy weapons in Beowulf. Hrunting was the sword given to Beowulf by
Unferth to battle Grendel’s mother. The
Giants’ Sword was used by Beowulf to kill Grendel’s mother when Hrunting
failed. Naegling was the sword that
broke when Beowulf struck the dragon.
Also featured throughout Beowulf but without specific names given them
were Knives and Daggers. (Tinkle)
There are some potential symbolisms in Hrunting. Swords were commonly exchanged as gifts of
friendship and as peace offerings. It
could have symbolized Unferth’s recognition of Beowulf’s prowess as a warrior
and as a man. It is possible that it
symbolized the acknowledgement by Unferth of his failures as a warrior and
accepts Beowulf as his people’s champion.
Finally, the failure of this sword could be a reflection of the original
owner’s, Unferth’s, character. Unferth
was infamous in this story for killing his own kin. (Tinkle)
There are further symbolisms that can be observed in the
Giant’s sword. The view could be taken
that the represents Pagan power. The
Giant’s sword had runic script which were believed to give magical powers to
weapons and likely contributed to Beowulf slaying Grendel’s mother. On the other hand, it could also be
representative of Christian power. On
the sword’s hilt recalls the story of the flood and God punishing evil forces
in the world. This would equate to
Beowulf using the sword to carry out God’s will to vanquish evil. One other possible symbolic representation of
the sword could be simple that of superior technology. The description of the sword would lead the
observant reader to believe it was made of damascened steel. The process of making Damascus steel was a
technologically better way to forge steel.
Thus this superior forging method produced better performing steel which
allowed Beowulf to kill Grendel’s mother. (Tinkle)
Naegling was the sword Beowulf used against the
dragon. There a potential symbolic
meaning behind its inclusion in this story.
The failure of this sword against the dragon could represent that Beowulf’s
era had come to an end and that a new king or hero needed to be crowned. This can possibly be further supported by the
fact that Beowulf’s thane managed to get in a blow on the dragon. The breakage of the sword in the story could
simple be method to relay how strong Beowulf was, his might always caused
swords to fail. However, this could also
imply that strength was improperly applied or force was inefficiently
used. (Tinkle)
Each sword in Beowulf
had a name with a specific meaning.
While the knives and daggers in Beowulf were not specifically named like
the swords, there are symbolic meanings to be found in the use of these weapons
in Beowulf. To begin analyzing the
meaning behind knives and dagger one must first look to their purpose. During the time of Beowulf a warrior had an
array of weapons to choose from. He had
swords, axes, spear, and pole arms. All
which were more efficient at killing and keeping your enemy at a distance. Therefore, knives and daggers were never
used as a primary weapon. They were
always carried as a backup or for utility purposes. When used in a fight they were always a
weapon of last resort. This holds true
when examining the two situations where knives were present in Beowulf.
Grendel’s mother is putting up
one last effort to avenge her son’s death.
Similarly, Beowulf is facing his ultimate demise as he uses the knife to
finally slay the dragon. This places the
knife in the context of the last stand or a desperation attempt. Each character has nothing else to lose, so
they attack with a dagger in on last attempt to gain glory or victory. Concerning the use by both Beowulf and
Grendel’s mother in this epic, this symbolized their last stand. Swords will be used for a majority of the
fight but many times it is the knife that is used to deliver the final
blow. (Tinkle)
Besides just analyzing the symbolism of the weapons
themselves we can draw further conclusions as to the symbolism based on the
failure of the swords in general. The
failure of the sword may represent the futility of war and suggest to the
reader that death is the only outcome of war. Furthermore, the failure of swords throughout
the poem could be indicative of the failure of the warrior culture to which
Beowulf belonged to. The culture during
Beowulf’s time period was largely based around fighting and the accumulation of
wealth was gain through warfare.
Therefore, the strength of a nation relied on its ability to kill its
neighbors. As a result, feuding was common
place and century-long grudges were used as an excuse to invade and
conquer. The failure of the sword could
represent the error in this lifestyle and be representative of the inevitable
downfall of a culture base on war and the inevitable results that constant
warring brings. Lastly, failing swords
could be seen as a symbol of strength and talent improperly applied. (Tinkle)
There
many interesting characters that adds to the fascinating tapestry of this
story. Some of the key or dominate
characters in Beowulf are the following; Beowulf was the hero of the Epic. Grendel was the first monster Beowulf battled. Grendel’s mother was the second monster that
Beowulf fought. Hrothgar was the aged
ruler of the Spear-Danes that accepted Beowulf’s help. Unferth was the dishonorable warrior in
Hrothgar’s court. Wiglaf was the only
one of Beowulf’s warriors that remained loyal and brave enough to help fight
the Dragon. Lastly, the Dragon was the
last monster Beowulf faced.
Despite
all the interesting characters previously mentioned, it was the monsters that
provide the most perceptibly symbolic personas to scrutinize. Many interesting things can be conjectured
from the presence of monsters in Beowulf and
what they possible represent. Grendel
could be a symbol for cosmic unreason, chaos/chaotic forces, wild animalistic
and murdering nature. Grendel’s mother
is representative of the desire for revenge and embodies unrighteous sinful
anger. It is important to remember that
revenge is a Pagan concept against the precepts of Christianity. In Christian belief, it is only God’s place
to avenge. The Dragon is a symbol of
perverse greed, hoarding, clinging, ceaseless craving and desire. Finally, all three monsters in Beowulf combined together might
potentially represent the individual aspects of the Devil.
One monster worthy of additional inspection from Beowulf is the Dragon. There is much to be drawn symbolically from
the Dragon. In Norse and European lore,
dragons were usually considered negative symbols associated with evil, greed,
and destruction. One of the most
infamous dragons in Norse lore was Nithhogr who was believed to live at the
base of the world tree, Yggdrasil, gnawing its roots attempting to destroy
it. Nithhogr also supposedly devoured
corpses of the dead. Another ill-famed
dragon was Jormungandr, the Midgard Serpent, who purportedly lived in the
waters curled in a circle round the world and biting his own tail. Jormungandr was notoriously blamed for
earthquakes. Also, well-known from the
Volsung Saga is Fafnir, who was turned into a dragon by his greed. Interestingly enough, this dragon was killed
by the hero of the saga, Sigmund, who was compared in the poem to Beowulf after
he defeated Grendel. This served to
foreshadow Beowulf’s eventual battle with the Dragon. (Lima)
Equally
important symbolically to the Dragon in Beowulf
was his gold. The origin of the Dragon’s
gold could symbolize a critique of the warrior culture. In the poem, the gold belonged to an ancient
race of people that disappeared due to their inability to stop killing one
another. Therefore, the futility of war
is one potential interpretation of the Dragon’s gold and is a theme echoed
throughout Beowulf. The Dragon’s gold could be seen as a
metaphor associated with the glory won after defeating your personal
demons. Dragons represented a warrior’s
greatest fear, being forgotten and disappearing into oblivion. Slaying dragons ensured the Warrior was
remembered and won the greatest treasure of all, immortality through posterity.
(Lima)
In
the epic poem, Beowulf, one can observe that time is cyclic in nature.
The story starts
by providing a legendary background on the Spear-Danes or Scyldings. An account
is giving concerning the founder of their ruling house, Shield Sheafson. This
is significant in that Hrothgar, the victim of Grendel’s murderous raids on his
mead hall, is his decedent. However, on the surface Shield’s background story
would appear to be just an incidental and random genealogical fact if it did
not lay down a cyclic pattern for the rest of Beowulf. As a baby, Shield Sheafson, treasure laden, mysteriously
arrived on the shores of the Scyldings. Furthermore, it is a fascinating
coincidence that when Shield died he departed the world in a similar fashion to
his arrival. Basically, the end of his life was much like its beginning. During
his funeral his body was sent sailing in a ship with a huge amount of treasure
and tribute. “They decked his body no less bountifully with offerings than
those first ones did who cast him away when he was a child and launched him
alone out over the waves.” (Beowulf,
a New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney 43)
This introduction and
passage in Beowulf symbolically sets the tone for the rest of the story. The
pattern that life is cyclic in nature is repeated numerous times throughout
Beowulf. Lastly, it is not surprising that the hero, Beowulf, died at the end
of this epic due to the repeating nature of this pattern. The beginning of this
epic served to foreshadow a hero’s rise to greatness and the eventual death
that must come to us all.
Moreover, the three agons, or heroic conflicts, of
Beowulf could be taken as a metaphor for the stages and challenges of a
warrior’s life. This is not surprising
since Nature’s cycle and the cyclic nature of life, in general, where common
Pagan themes that may have intentional been included in Beowulf. The most obvious
cycle in this story would, in order, be youth, middle age, and old age. In youth, you make your way in the world, seek
fame, and face any obstacle brashly and without fear. During middle age, one faces challenges with
wisdom as well as brawn. Furthermore,
consequences of your life choices must be faced. Finally, in old age, you face your defining
moment with courage. You chose to live
the noble life in accord with the warrior ethos. In the end, one would rather die for a noble
cause than die peacefully of old age. It
is best to seek the ultimate glory and a place in Valhalla. Therefore, in this light, Beowulf can be
viewed as a road map of life with the ultimate goal of living the good life,
which is to be remembered as is pronounced in the following passage;
“For
every one of us, living in this world
means
waiting for our end. Let whoever can
Win
glory before death. When a warrior is
gone,
That
will be his best and only bulwark.” (Beowulf,
New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney 1384-1389)
In
addition to inspecting the theme concerning the stages in a warrior’s life, one
can also observe the intertwining wyrd or destinies of three groups of peoples;
the Spear Danes, Geats, and Swedes.
First, we are introduced to the Spear Danes or Danes. We are provided with a brief history of their
founding up until King Hrothgar’s distress and suffering at the hands of
Grendel. Then Beowulf liberates the
Danes but foretells their eventual struggle with a rival kingdom. He discoursed this in the protected hall of
his king, Hygelac. Ironically, later in
the story Beowulf himself would become king of the Geats. As result of his death in the battle with the
Dragon, the Geats were left without their heroic king and were thus ill
prepared to defend themselves from the inevitable invasion of the Swedes. The Swedes, although not part of the main
action, are the third group of people in Beowulf whose destiny is interwoven
with the other two groups. This is
exemplified the intricate and intriguing concept of wyrd in Beowulf. (Beowulf, a New Verse
Translation by Seamus Heaney xiv)
There is an overabundance
of symbolism in the epic poem Beowulf. In fact, there is so much allegory in Beowulf that to read it as only a story
would be a mistake. Beowulf is more than
just simple a story; it is a profound teaching narrative. Its true value lies with the many potential
lessons it has to impart. These lessons
lie within the symbolism and imagery of this work. This symbolism can be found in various
aspects of this poem to include; the poetic devices used, use of words, the
Pagan and Christian elements within, the characters and their interactions,
places in this story, and weapons used.
Also, Beowulf relation to the
stages in a warrior’s life is a relevant matter. Finally, this paper provided a background on
this epic poem as well as explored the many potential symbols within and regarding
this famous piece of literature.
Works Cited
Heaney,
Seamus. Beowulf, a New Verse Translation by Seamus Heaney. 1st. New
York: W.W. Norton , 2000. Print.
McNamara,
John. Beowulf. 1st ed. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2007. Print.
Tinkle,
Theresa, ed. "Swords and Daggers in Beowulf." Medieval Literature
and Material Culture. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Web. 26 Nov 2012.
<http://sitemaker.umich.edu/swordsanddaggers/hrunting>.
Wheeler,
L. Kip. "Dr. Wheeler's Website." Literary Terms and Definitions.
N.p.. Web. 26 Nov 2012. <http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/lit_terms_K.html>.
"The
British Library." Learning Changing Language. N.p.. Web. 26 Nov
2012. <http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/changlang/writtenword
Wills,
Tarrin. "The Skaldic Poetry Project." Kennings. N.p.. Web. 26
Nov 2012.
<http://abdn.ac.uk/skaldic/db.php?if=default&table=home&view=>.
Kolomeyskaya,
Svetlana. "Beowulf." Kennings and Other Elements. N.p.. Web.
26 Nov 2012. <http://csis.pace.edu/grendel/projf981d/terms.html>.
Lima ,
Eduardo. "Ed's Essays-Essays on English Literature." Beowulf's
Dragon and Fafnir:A Comparative Analysis. N.p., n. d. Web. Web. 26 Nov.
2012. <http://edessays.wordpress.com/>.
The
History of Beowulf.
N.p.. Web. 30 Dec 2012.
<http://csis.pace.edu/grendel/projf20004d/History.html>.
Comments
Post a Comment